LPL Financial LLC found itself in the headlines when it discharged financial advisor William Bernard Tunink in September 2025, following serious allegations related to borrowing money from clients. The case surrounding Tunink, who also had prior affiliations with Avantax Investment Services, Inc., offers a cautionary tale about the essential role of trust between investors and their financial professionals, as well as the importance of regulatory oversight within the finance industry.
William Bernard Tunink: A Career Marred by Allegations
William Bernard Tunink, identified by CRD #2738224, was no newcomer to the field. Over his career, he passed the Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) exam, Series 7, Series 6, and Series 63, and was registered with well-known firms. However, despite this strong résumé, Tunink’s professional history reveals a string of troubling incidents, including a staggering 24 customer disputes recorded on FINRA BrokerCheck. Compare this to the industry norm: most financial advisors have zero to three complaints across their careers—a stark contrast that highlights just how atypical Tunink’s record is.
According to FINRA records, the specific allegations against Tunink include borrowing funds from customers for so-called “investment opportunities” that were not affiliated with his registered firm. For instance:
- March 12, 2026: A customer alleged that William Tunink borrowed funds for an off-platform investment, with claimed damages of $307,131.36 (pending resolution).
- February 24, 2026: Another customer claimed that he borrowed $41,000 for a similar opportunity. This matter was immediately settled for the full amount.
These types of allegations point to severe breakdowns in standard practice and oversight, especially since borrowing from clients is a prohibited act under industry rules unless strict conditions are met.
An Overview of Disclosures and Customer Complaints
William Bernard Tunink’s disclosure history does not stop with borrowing allegations. Over several years, his record reportedly includes a range of customer complaints, such as:
| Nature of Dispute | Claimed or Settled Amount | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Unauthorized trading | $15,000 (settlement) | Resolved |
| Failure to supervise recommendations | $120,000 (claimed) | Pending/Unknown |
| Misrepresentation of fund performance | $60,000 (settlement) | Resolved |
| Unsuitable investment recommendations | N/A | Multiple allegations |
| Borrowing funds for outside investments | Above $300,000 (pending) | Pending/Settled |
It’s worth noting that the employment separation disclosure for William Tunink states he was discharged from LPL Financial LLC for “failing to disclose and receive prior approval for loans from customers and settling a customer complaint away from the firm.” This highlights not only a lack of internal controls but also a potential pattern of bypassing established supervisory channels designed to protect both investors and firms.
Why Borrowing from Clients Is Strictly Regulated
Borrowing money from clients undermines the fiduciary relationship at the heart of financial advising. FINRA Rule 3240 is clear on this point: registered representatives are generally prohibited from borrowing from customers unless they meet very narrow exceptions and the arrangement is disclosed to and approved by the firm. For context on industry norms and regulations, you can refer to these common types of advisor fraud on Investopedia.
Why are the rules so strict? When advisors borrow from clients, it blurs the professional boundaries and creates serious conflicts of interest. It risks turning a trust-based relationship into a potential financial liability for the customer. In addition, FINRA Rule 3280 requires advisors to obtain written approval from their firm before they engage in any private securities transactions. These rules exist to maintain transparency and protect investors from arrangements that evade firm oversight.
- Do not borrow from or lend to clients, except in very specific situations.
- Never conduct investment business away from your firm without full written disclosure and approval.
- Put client interests above personal or firm interests at all times.
Regulatory rules are not just bureaucratic hurdles—they are vital safeguards. The financial crisis of 2008 and other high-profile fraud cases show what can happen when oversight and risk controls are ignored.
The Broader Problem: Investment Fraud Among Financial Advisors
The dangers of misconduct in the financial advisory world aren’t limited to borrowing or lending. A 2016 study by researchers from the University of Chicago and University of Minnesota found that roughly 7% of financial advisors have been disciplined for misconduct, yet nearly half of those advisors are reemployed in the industry within a year. Furthermore, advisors with more than five complaints are statistically much more likely to commit serious fraud or abuse (source: Bloomberg).
This persistent issue is why investors should routinely check the background of anyone handling their assets. Looking up an advisor’s CRD number and reviewing their BrokerCheck record is a basic but essential step. If you see a long list of disputes—as in William Bernard Tunink’s case—it may be a signal to take your business elsewhere.
The Consequences for William Bernard Tunink and His Clients
For William Bernard Tunink, the fallout was decisive: his discharge from LPL Financial LLC amid numerous unresolved and settled customer complaints has left his future in the industry uncertain at best. With two dozen dispute disclosures and a high-profile termination, the chance of him gaining a new position as a registered representative is extremely slim. Regulatory authorities and prospective employers view such histories with utmost caution.
For affected investors, however, the impact can be more severe than numbers suggest. Financial losses are often compounded by the breakdown of trust in financial institutions and professionals. Some customers have turned to arbitration, some have secured settlements, and others have undertaken legal actions to recover borrowed funds or lost investments. According to research by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), victims of financial fraud frequently report lasting psychological and emotional harm in addition to their monetary losses.
Lessons for Investors: Building a Safer Future
- Research your advisor thoroughly: Always check FINRA BrokerCheck for customer disputes and disciplinary history.
- Heed red flags: Multiple disclosures and unresolved complaints should not be ignored.
- Reject requests for personal loans: An ethical and reputable advisor will never need to borrow from a client—this violates both industry protocol and the trust essential to the relationship.
- Be skeptical of “special deals” outside your advisor’s official firm: If it’s not approved by the firm, it’s rarely in your best interest.
The financial services industry utterly depends on trust and honesty. Cases like that of William Bernard Tunink serve as a powerful reminder of why vigilance—by both firms and investors—is essential. Regulatory rules are not excess bureaucracy, but a necessary safety net to protect clients against bad advice and fraud.
Investors should arm themselves with the knowledge and tools available, such as FINRA BrokerCheck and public disciplinary records. If an advisor’s background reveals complaint patterns like those of William Bernard Tunink, it’s time to seek better and safer financial guidance elsewhere.
Correction or Updated Info Needed? The information in this article includes the publisher's opinion and is based on publicly available materials believed to be accurate at the time of publication.
We welcome updates. If you have personal knowledge of additional facts or details related to any issues or individuals, and you believe that information would enhance the accuracy of the article, don't hesitate to get in touch with us https://financialadvisorcomplaints.com/article-correction-update/ and provide you name, address, email, and telephone contact for follow-up reporting, along with the back-up for any updates. The publisher strives to provide the most up-to-date and most accurate report regarding all issues and events, and welcomes input from any individuals with personal knowledge.
DISCLAIMER: The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.
