My Perspective on Daniel Snodgrass’s FINRA Sanctions and Dismissals

Let’s talk about risks and rewards in investing—a concept I delve into every day as a financial analyst. But when your financial advisor becomes the risk—that’s trouble. I’ve seen what happens when advisors like Daniel Stephen Snodgrass [CRD: 4083817] lead their clients astray, and it’s not pretty.

As someone who breaks down complex financial situations for my readers, I’ll give you the backstory. Snodgrass worked out of Cherry Hill, New Jersey, connected to BCG Securities, Inc. from early 2017 to mid-2023. But his FINRA BrokerCheck record was marred with warnings of potential professional misconduct, causing worry for investors around the States.

Examining the Spate of Disputes:

The concerning narrative around Snodgrass’s work ethics crashed into the spotlight on September 29, 2023. FINRA took him to task with strict disciplinary measures. Now, you’d never expect such from the person managing your investments. The accusations? He ignored compliance with a vital arbitration award or settlement, and worse, he couldn’t prove his responsibility to the regulatory body.

A Career Crisis or Repeated Missteps?

stock news(AD) Lost money because of bad financial advice or outright fraud? You may get it back by filing a complaint. Haselkorn & Thibaut has 50+ years of experience and a 98% success rate. Don’t delay if you’ve suffered losses. 

Call Haselkorn & Thibaut at 1-888-784-3315 for a free consultation, or visit InvestmentFraudLawyers.com to schedule. No Recovery, No Fee.

It’s important to mention that BCG Securities actually let Snodgrass go on July 6, 2023, due to his disregard for managing a client’s account correctly. But it wasn’t a one-off case. Earlier, on September 26, 2016, UBS Financial Services also cut ties with him for bending several important rules, not least of all the proper vetting of a new client.

An Alarming Track Record:

Casting a glance back to 2009, a Citigroup Global Markets client accused Snodgrass of disobeying investment instructions. That error supposedly caused significant losses in stocks and mutual funds. The client demanded $122,000 in damages but was ultimately turned down by the firm.

More complaints arose when another Citigroup client implicated Snodgrass in murky sales practices on March 12, 2009, specifically over selling a variable annuity in 2006. The client brought up a damages claim of $100,800. Once again, the assertion was rejected a month later.

What Should Investors Do Now?

If you’re one of the unfortunate investors who suffered losses because of Snodgrass’s advice, it’s time to take charge. Despite the denials from his side, recovering your investments should be your number one priority. My advice? Chat with an experienced securities attorney to explore your options.

Watching such cases unfold, one is reminded of the wisdom in the famous quote, “The stock market is filled with individuals who know the price of everything, but the value of nothing.” As investors, trusting your financial advisor is key, but it’s crucial to remain alert. It is, after all, about the protection of your assets.

Fun fact: Did you know that a significant percentage of investors don’t check their financial advisor’s record? According to an SEC study, nearly 5% of financial advisors have been cited for misconduct. So, make sure you’re dealing with a reliable professional—use tools like the FINRA CRM to double-check their record. It’s simply good practice.

In closing, keep this personal mantra in mind: verify, then trust. Your financial security is worth that extra due diligence. If you’ve been following me, you know I stand for informed investment decisions, so take this tale of Daniel Snodgrass as a cautionary lesson.

Scroll to Top