Independent Financial Group advisor Michael Tannery (CRD #1538345) recently faced troubling allegations of misconduct, highlighting how critical transparency and ethical advice are within the financial advisory industry. Renowned investor Warren Buffett once famously remarked, “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.” This insightful observation is particularly apt in cases involving financial advisors who have allegedly misrepresented investment risks or provided unsuitable advice. The unfolding allegations against Tannery underline exactly why caution and due diligence remain crucial for anyone entrusting their financial future to professional advisors.
The case at hand: understanding the allegations
Michael Tannery, who is currently registered and working with Independent Financial Group, is confronted with serious investor allegations surrounding inadequate disclosure of investment risks. On January 3, 2025, a former client lodged a substantial complaint alleging claimed damages of $150,000. The complaint specifically maintains that investments recommended by Tannery, which primarily included alternative investment products recommended between 2020 and 2024, featured risks that were improperly disclosed, misrepresented, or unsuitable based on the client’s personal risk profile.
The core elements of this complaint include allegations centering on three significant issues:
- Failure to properly disclose investment risks associated with alternative investment products.
- Misrepresentation of the nature, characteristics, and risks of recommended alternative investments.
- Providing investment recommendations unsuitable for the client’s specific financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance.
Alternative investment products, such as real estate investment trusts (REITs), non-traded investments, commodities, limited partnerships, or complex structured investments, can carry significant risks and may be challenging to liquidate quickly. According to a detailed report by Investopedia, these types of investments often fall outside traditional asset categories like stocks, bonds, and cash and thus require particularly careful suitability analyses and diligent risk disclosures.
Professional background and history
A deeper look into the professional background of Michael Tannery provides additional perspective relating to these allegations. With over 29 years of experience in the financial services sector, he has operated through multiple reputable firms. The firm has been registered with Independent Financial Group an Investment Adviser (IA) since May 31, 2013, and as a Broker-Dealer (B) since June 12, 2013. The individual’s previous registrations include:
-
LPL Financial LLC (CRD#:6413): December 4, 2001, to June 13, 2013
-
Prudential Securities Incorporated (CRD#:7471): September 17, 1998, to December 13, 2001
-
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (CRD#:7691): August 6, 1992, to September 10, 1998
-
EquiSource Securities Corporation (CRD#:15730): August 14, 1986, to February 1, 1991
The Mr. Tannery has been in the industry since 1986, accumulating approximately 39 years of experience as of 2025.
Investors need to understand that regulatory oversight is in place to identify and help eliminate misconduct. According to FINRA statistics, roughly 8% of financial advisors have at least one disclosure event on their professional record. Hence, it is paramount that investors carry out full due diligence using accessible tools such as FINRA BrokerCheck, which tracks the detailed histories and disciplinary records of brokers and financial advisors.
Breaking down FINRA rules and investor protections
The specific accusations directed toward Tannery illustrate potential violations of FINRA Rule 2111, concerning the suitability requirement. This rule clearly outlines responsibilities that financial advisors hold to recommend only appropriate investments and strategies that align accurately with their client’s financial objectives and tolerance for risk.
In practice, adhering to this rule means an advisor must:
- Thoroughly understand the associated risks and characteristics of financial products before recommending them.
- Believe firmly that any recommendation meets the specific needs and circumstances of their client.
- Clearly and transparently explain all potential risks and drawbacks inherent in recommended financial products or strategies.
An analogy may help illustrate this critical regulatory stance—a financial advisor operates much like a doctor prescribing medication. Just as medical professionals must comprehend thoroughly the treatments they administer, tailor their prescriptions to each specific patient, and clearly outline potential side effects, financial advisors must ensure they recommend only investments suitable for their particular investor and disclose all relevant risks clearly and accurately.
The scope and risks of investment fraud and unsuitable advice
According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), investment fraud cases involving misrepresentation and undisclosed risks have collectively amounted to billions of dollars in investor losses over recent decades. Often, these instances involve advisors recommending sophisticated alternative investments to clients who either do not have the risk tolerance or sufficient understanding of what they’re getting into. Unfortunately, when investors face significant financial damages from poorly advised or deceptive investment choices, the impact isn’t confined merely to their finances—it frequently causes long-term emotional stress, dramatic lifestyle changes, and sometimes irrecoverable economic hardship.
Notably, a report highlighted by CNBC revealed that certain types of investment fraud and unsuitable recommendations often involve advisors who prey primarily on retired individuals or individuals nearing retirement age. Investors must stay especially vigilant regarding overly complex investments, aggressive sales tactics, and investments offering returns that appear excessively high or guaranteed.
Consequences and implications
Should FINRA or another regulatory body determine that Tannery or similar advisors have genuinely violated professional conduct guidelines or committed fraud, the possible consequences may include significant enforcement actions. These potential disciplinary responses encompass:
- Financial penalties and fines
- Suspension or even permanent revocation of financial licenses
- Mandatory financial restitution that compensates affected clients for losses
- Additional educational or supervisory requirements to continue practicing within the industry
Beyond the personal implications for an advisor who violates regulatory codes, the broader investor community must reflect on essential practical measures. Experts strongly recommend all investors:
- Request detailed written risk disclosures and documentation from financial advisors.
- Diligently verify advisors’ backgrounds regularly via tools like Financial Advisor Complaints or FINRA’s BrokerCheck.
- Proactively seek second opinions from independent financial professionals when recommended complex or high-risk investments.
- Never hesitate to ask comprehensive, probing questions about financial strategies or investment products being offered.
Building a vigilant investment community
Preventing future occurrences of investment misconduct requires increased awareness, ongoing education, and meticulous due diligence on the part of both investors and advisory firms. Financial regulators constantly encourage investors to remain vigilant to fraud signals, such as unusually consistent returns, unclear or complicated investment details, exclusivity claims, or urgent and time-sensitive pitches. Moreover, regulatory organizations like FINRA, the SEC, and state securities agencies provide tools and resources urging investors towards informed, cautious decision-making.
Financial transparency and investor education remain foundational to reinforcing trust in the financial advice industry. A healthy, vibrant marketplace hinges not just on individual advisor integrity but also on the robust communication between advisors, firms, regulators, and investors themselves. While many financial professionals genuinely prioritize client interests, unfortunate instances involving advisors like Michael Tannery emphasize that investors must consistently advocate for their own financial protection and deal prudently with the advice provided by financial professionals.
If you have personal knowledge of additional facts or details related to any issues or individuals, and you believe that information would enhance the accuracy of the article, please contact https://financialadvisorcomplaints.com/contact-us/ and provide you name, address, email, and telephone contact for follow-up reporting, along with the back-up for any updates. The publisher strives to provide the most up to date and most accurate report regarding all issues and events and welcomes input from any individuals with personal knowledge.
The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.
