New York Broker Fined for Investors’ Protection Violations
Dec 10, 2023—I’m Emily Carter, a financial analyst and writer breaking down complex financial mishaps, and today we’re delving into a concerning case out of New York. There are troubling concerns about investment misconduct from Michael Joseph Murray, a broker at Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD, known via his CRD#5034449, that have risen to the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Michael Murray’s Background
I’ve followed Murray’s career that started in 2005, observing as he moved through prestigious firms like Casimir Capital L.P and Aegis Capital Corp. However, his more recent stint at Laidlaw & Co., where he is a registered broker, has brought to light some disconcerting issues.
The Shocking Charges
In November 2023, the SEC initiated cease-and-desist proceedings against brokers Richard Michalski and Michael Murray, an alarming development for the financial community. In response, both submitted Offers of Settlement that were accepted by the Commission. The order indicates from July 2020 to October 2021, the brokers flouted the Regulation Best Interest (Reg. BI) Care Obligation when counseling four retail customers.
They didn’t just step over the line; they leapt over it. The Commission couldn’t justify claiming the transaction recommendations were beneficial for these clients, marking them as excessive and inconsistent with the clients’ investment objectives. It was particularly worrisome that profit motives may have influenced their counsel over the customers’ best interests.
 (AD) Lost money because of bad financial advice or outright fraud? You may get it back by filing a complaint. Haselkorn & Thibaut has 50+ years of experience and a 98% success rate. Don’t delay if you’ve suffered losses. Call Haselkorn & Thibaut at 1-888-784-3315 for a free consultation, or visit InvestmentFraudLawyers.com to schedule. No Recovery, No Fee. |
This supposed failure to prioritize customer needs led to the declaration of Murray willfully breaching the Exchange Act Rules 15l-1(a)(2)(ii)(C) and 15l-1(a)(1).
The Consequences
The commission didn’t hold back in their decision. Murray was ordered to cease such violations, faced public censure, and was hit with repaying $24,414.17 plus interest of $1,143.91. Additionally, and perhaps most shockingly, he was slammed with a $20,000 fine.
Protecting Investors
Cases like this shine a light on the crucial task of policing and understanding the concept of quantitative suitability in trading. Excessive trading is often a red flag for an advisor’s needs taking precedence over a client’s, aiming to rack up commissions rather than protecting investor interests. As Warren Buffet once aptly said, “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it.” Here, we witness the truth in those words.
Brokers are duty-bound to recommend investment strategies that match a client’s profile, while firms are responsible for keeping a close eye on their financial advisors’ interactions with clients. When these responsibilities are neglected, and clients suffer losses as a result, they may have the right to recuperate their investments.
Every investor should feel secure with their financial advisor, but the truth is not all are acting in their client’s best interests. One alarming financial fact is that more than half of all financial advisors who find themselves disciplined for misconduct are allowed to continue advising. This underscores the need for investors to do their due diligence, which includes verifying an advisor’s FINRA CRD number and past infractions.
Remember, investing is your future on the line, and I’m here to help make sense of these sometimes-baffling financial waters. Stay informed, stay vigilant, and don’t be afraid to seek out expert advice. Your peace of mind and financial well-being are worth that extra mile.
