Andrew Mack, a former advisor with Raymond James Financial Services and previously with Alliance Global Partners (AGP), is at the center of a recent FINRA enforcement action that underscores the ongoing risks investors face from discretionary trading violations and poor advisor oversight. Cases like this highlight why due diligence and vigilance remain essential for anyone entrusting their finances to a professional.
Understanding the Andrew Mack Case
From May 2021 through July 2023, Andrew Mack allegedly engaged in a pattern of unauthorized discretionary trading across 84 client accounts. The breadth of the issue—totaling roughly 1,700 improper trades—draws attention to the importance of written authorization procedures in the investment industry. Perhaps most alarming, 230 of these trades occurred during a period when Mack was under heightened supervision due to previous concerns and was explicitly prohibited from discretionary trading.
| Key Findings | Details |
|---|---|
| Duration of Violations | May 2021 – July 2023 |
| Accounts Impacted | 84 client accounts |
| Total Unauthorized Trades | Approximately 1,700 |
| While Under Heightened Supervision | 230 unauthorized trades |
| Regulatory Outcome | $10,000 fine; 3-month suspension |
FINRA Rules at the Heart of the Case
The fundamental rules violated—FINRA Rule 3260(b) and Rule 2010—are designed to protect investors and ensure the integrity of the brokerage industry:
- Rule 3260(b): Requires that advisors obtain prior written authorization from clients and firm approval before engaging in discretionary trading.
- Rule 2010: Demands that advisors observe “high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.”
To put it simply, discretionary trading allows a financial advisor to make decisions to buy or sell securities in a client’s account without needing to get consent for every single trade. However, this privilege can only be exercised if the client has given explicit, written approval and the advisor’s firm permits it—in much the same way a teacher needs a parent’s written consent before taking students on a trip.
By not only skipping the vital step of acquiring written authorization, but also executing hundreds of trades while prohibited from doing so, Mack violated both the trust of his clients and the ethical expectations of his profession. Additionally, he was found to have made false statements on compliance questionnaires, further compounding the breach.
Professional Background
Andrew Mack has an 11-year track record in the financial advisory industry, holding high-level certifications such as Series 65, 63, 7, and SIE. Over his career, he has worked with several reputable firms:
- Raymond James Financial Services (2025)
- Alliance Global Partners (2020–2024)
- Aegis Capital Corporation (2017–2020)
- National Securities Corporation (2016–2017)
- Laidlaw & Company (2012–2016)
Following FINRA’s investigation, Mack was handed a three-month suspension and a $10,000 fine. He now holds no active licenses with any brokerage or state authority.
Investment Fraud and Misconduct: A Broader Perspective
This incident is not an isolated event in the financial industry. The Securities and Exchange Commission reports that approximately $1.3 billion in penalties were issued against brokers and advisors for misconduct in 2024 alone. Such transgressions include unauthorized trading, excessive commissions, and unsuitable recommendations.
A recent Forbes article detailed how several advisors were fined for steering clients into unnecessarily costly mutual fund share classes when more affordable options were available—actions that erode investor returns over time. This pattern of misconduct—whether through negligence or bad-faith decisions—highlights the need for strong regulatory safeguards.
Lessons for Everyday Investors
The Mack case illustrates four key lessons:
- Insist on Written Documentation: Always provide and retain clear, written trading authorizations for any account activity. Verbal instructions are rarely sufficient protection.
- Monitor Accounts Regularly: Review your account statements closely and look out for any trades you do not recognize or did not approve.
- Understand Advisor Oversight: Know whether your advisor is under heightened supervision. Ask about any prior disciplinary history before establishing a relationship.
- Conduct Your Own Background Checks: Use the FINRA BrokerCheck system, which publicly lists an advisor’s employment history, certifications, and disclosure events. For example, Mack can be found under CRD# 5932062.
If you ever suspect your advisor of wrongdoing, report it promptly. Resources like Financial Advisor Complaints can help guide you through the process and advocate on your behalf.
The Importance of Regulatory Oversight and Investor Education
Regulatory enforcement actions, while rare among the total number of financial professionals, serve as an important deterrent and a way to restore confidence in the market. Active oversight by agencies like FINRA and the SEC work in tandem with resources like Investor.gov to keep consumers informed, aware, and empowered.
Ultimately, most financial advisors operate with integrity and prioritize client wellbeing. Still, by remaining diligent, understanding your rights, and utilizing available resources, you can better safeguard your financial future. When issues do arise, swift regulatory action helps prevent further harm and maintains trust in the financial markets.
For more answers to advisor misconduct and steps investors can take, visit Financial Advisor Complaints.
Correction or Updated Info Needed? The information in this article includes the publisher's opinion and is based on publicly available materials believed to be accurate at the time of publication.
We welcome updates. If you have personal knowledge of additional facts or details related to any issues or individuals, and you believe that information would enhance the accuracy of the article, don't hesitate to get in touch with us https://financialadvisorcomplaints.com/article-correction-update/ and provide you name, address, email, and telephone contact for follow-up reporting, along with the back-up for any updates. The publisher strives to provide the most up-to-date and most accurate report regarding all issues and events, and welcomes input from any individuals with personal knowledge.
DISCLAIMER: The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.
