Ameriprise Financial Services and its advisor, Richard Kersting, have recently come under scrutiny due to a high-profile complaint that has raised questions about suitability and investor protection in the financial advisory industry. Operating out of Naples, Florida, Richard Kersting (CRD# 1835418) faces allegations that highlight the vital importance of verifying your financial advisor’s recommendations, background, and track record.
Latest Allegations against Richard Kersting: Aggressive Advice and Unsuitability Claims
In February 2026, a formal complaint was filed against Richard Kersting at Ameriprise Financial Services. The pending dispute alleges that Kersting recommended an “aggressive investment strategy incompatible with [the customers’] investment profile,” with the claim seeking damages amounting to $500,000. This is not a trivial sum—it could mean the difference between a secure retirement, funding a child’s education, or maintaining financial stability for the affected clients.
This case underscores the significance of financial suitability. Suitability means that an advisor’s recommendations must match the customer’s:
- Age and retirement timeline
- Specific financial goals
- Risk tolerance and capacity for loss
- Investment knowledge and experience
- Overall financial situation and net worth
Imagine asking for a safe, dependable investment plan due to your conservative risk profile—and instead, being placed in complex and volatile investment vehicles. That’s precisely what the complaint against Richard Kersting alleges: investment advice that was fundamentally misaligned with clients’ real needs. The consequences of such unsuitable advice are profound, often leading to unexpected financial losses and eroded trust.
Not the First Complaint: Richard Kersting‘s Track Record and Professional Background
According to the records maintained by FINRA, this is not the first time Richard Kersting has faced client allegations. In 2001, while affiliated with Southwick Investments and Josephthal & Company, a complaint accused him of churning (excessive trading), misrepresentation, and recommending unsuitable products. That incident was settled for $24,500.
Over a span of 25 years, Kersting has cultivated an extensive, though somewhat itinerant, career. He is currently registered as a broker and investment advisor with Ameriprise Financial Services since 2021. His career includes time at notable firms such as Bruderman Brothers, Gary Goldberg & Company, Purshe Kaplan Sterling, and over a dozen others.
| Year | Firm | Role |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-Present | Ameriprise Financial Services | Broker/Advisor |
| Varied Years | Bruderman Brothers, Gary Goldberg & Company, Purshe Kaplan Sterling, Southwick Investments, Josephthal & Company and others | Broker/Advisor |
Kersting’s credentials are extensive. He has passed the SIE, Series 65, Series 63, Series 10, Series 9, Series 24, Series 99TO, and Series 7 licensing exams, and he holds licenses in 30 U.S. states. While credentials are essential, they do not guarantee ethical decision-making or client-first behavior—something that investor education and oversight continue to highlight.
Recent studies indicate that approximately 7% of financial advisors have at least one disclosure event such as a formal complaint or regulatory action on their record (Investopedia). However, many investors never review an advisor’s background using resources like Financial Advisor Complaints or the official FINRA BrokerCheck.
What Suitability Means under FINRA Rule 2111
Suitability is the foundation of responsible financial advice. Under FINRA Rule 2111, brokers must ensure that the products and strategies they recommend are suitable for each client’s specific circumstances. Suitability has three major components:
- Reasonable-basis suitability: Advisors must fully understand the recommended investment and its risks to determine its appropriateness for at least some investors.
- Customer-specific suitability: Each recommendation must be appropriate for the individual client’s needs, risk tolerance, and financial profile.
- Quantitative suitability: Even a suitable investment can become unsuitable if traded excessively or formed into an overly aggressive strategy.
For instance, consider high-risk assets like leveraged ETFs, aggressive options strategies, or emerging market equities. These vehicles may serve a purpose for high-net-worth or high-tolerance investors. For retirees or those unable to withstand significant loss, such allocations can be inappropriate and even devastating.
Investment Fraud and the Real-World Impact of Bad Advice
The alleged wrongdoing in the Richard Kersting case echoes larger national issues in securities regulation. According to the SEC, unsuitable investment recommendations are among the most common sources of investor loss and regulatory action. Recent years have seen a rise in financial advisor fraud, with victims collectively losing billions of dollars. Forbes reports that in 2023 alone, investment scams accounted for over $3.8 billion in reported losses, many stemming from unsuitable recommendations or outright fraud (Forbes: Investment Fraud Losses).
Victims of unsuitable advice or advisor fraud often face not just financial setbacks, but also psychological and emotional tolls. Money lost to poor recommendations may be recoverable through FINRA arbitration, but the time and trust lost can rarely be restored.
What Investors Should Learn from the Richard Kersting Case
The ongoing FINRA arbitration involving Richard Kersting is a stark reminder: due diligence is your first—and best—line of defense as an investor. Here are practical steps every investor should take to stay protected:
- Always check your advisor’s record using tools like BrokerCheck.
- Research and ask about any past complaints, settlements, or regulatory actions.
- Be clear about your financial goals and risk tolerance—reiterate them in writing to your advisor.
- Question investment recommendations that seem too risky, complex, or at odds with your stated objectives.
- Review every transaction on your account statements for discrepancies or unauthorized activity.
- Keep written records of all communication with your advisor.
Remember, your financial advisor is there to serve your best interests—not the other way around. Credentials and a lengthy resume, as exemplified by Richard Kersting, are important, but ongoing vigilance protects your investments. If something feels wrong, don’t hesitate to ask questions, seek clarity, or consult a third party.
Conclusion: Trust but Verify—The Case of Richard Kersting
In summary, the allegations against Richard Kersting at Ameriprise Financial Services highlight why suitability, transparency, and due diligence are vital in choosing the right advisor. While experience over decades is valuable, history also demonstrates that past concerns may reappear—and that trust is something earned and maintained through both credentials and conduct.
If you are considering working with a financial advisor, or especially if you are a client of Richard Kersting or anyone at Ameriprise Financial Services, take proactive steps to review their background and verify that your investments are truly in line with your needs. For further reading on advisor complaints and investor protections, visit Financial Advisor Complaints
Correction or Updated Info Needed? The information in this article includes the publisher's opinion and is based on publicly available materials believed to be accurate at the time of publication.
We welcome updates. If you have personal knowledge of additional facts or details related to any issues or individuals, and you believe that information would enhance the accuracy of the article, don't hesitate to get in touch with us https://financialadvisorcomplaints.com/article-correction-update/ and provide you name, address, email, and telephone contact for follow-up reporting, along with the back-up for any updates. The publisher strives to provide the most up-to-date and most accurate report regarding all issues and events, and welcomes input from any individuals with personal knowledge.
DISCLAIMER: The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.
