Understanding the Implications of Leslie Don Jackson’s FINRA Sanctions

As a financial analyst and writer, I was taken aback by the recent sanctions against Leslie Don Jackson by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). His disbarment raises red flags for investors, particularly those who may have suffered losses due to Jackson’s potentially improper sales practices.

My Take on Jackson’s Permanent FINRA Disbarment

Leslie Jackson’s tenure at Momentum Independent Network Inc., spanning from 1991 to early 2023, ended with a stark consequence: a lifetime ban by FINRA. Why? For Jackson’s alleged engagement in unapproved private securities transactions to the tune of nearly $2 million. This sort of activity skirts around the protocols his employers should have been involved in.

Jackson’s activities focused on the sale of promissory notes linked to construction financing, a move he advised to five investors, which included both a relative and three clients of his firm. These recommendations resulted in considerable investments, amounting to $1,475,000. But Jackson’s involvement ran deeper: he advised on the notes, addressed investor questions, helped with paperwork, and oversaw payments to the issuers.

In a turn of events, it came to light that Jackson may have been compensated by the issuers he promoted, apparently receiving 3% of each investment per year, paid out monthly. And despite this, it was suspected that he denied this involvement in security transactions when questioned by his firm.

stock news(AD) Lost money because of bad financial advice or outright fraud? You may get it back by filing a complaint. Haselkorn & Thibaut has 50+ years of experience and a 98% success rate. Don’t delay if you’ve suffered losses. 

Call Haselkorn & Thibaut at 1-888-784-3315 for a free consultation, or visit InvestmentFraudLawyers.com to schedule. No Recovery, No Fee.

The Fallout: Momentum Independent Network Inc.’s Response

Momentum Independent Network Inc. swiftly disassociated from Jackson following the allegations, ending their relationship as of December 9, 2022. The company pointed to his policy violations as the primary reason for the separation.

Legal Battles: Jackson’s Accusations of Breach and More

Beyond company policy issues, Jackson faces accusations from a client who filed a complaint with FINRA. The customer cites inappropriate advice, a breach of fiduciary duty, and contract negligence. The alleged result? Financial losses tied to a promissory note, leading the client to seek $675,000 in damages. This arbitration process is still underway.

Can Investors Recover Losses Linked to Jackson?

Investors are understandably curious about whether they can recoup losses connected to Jackson. The possibility of reimbursement depends on the details of each case and the legal avenues for reclaiming investment losses. Despite Jackson and his former employers’ denials of misconduct, the severity of the claims and the significant sums of money involved mean the scrutiny on Jackson persists.

As Warren Buffett once said, “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it.” This situation underscores the importance of due diligence and the consequences of violating trust in the financial world. And here’s a fact that punctuates the significance of this matter: a study by FINRA found that a large proportion of financial advisors with records of misconduct continue to work in the industry. This is why it’s always important to check the FINRA BrokerCheck for an advisor’s history, including their FINRA CRD number, before investing.

As someone deeply entrenched in the intricacies of finance and regulation, I keep a close eye on cases like Jackson’s. They serve as cautionary tales and highlight the need for investor vigilance. The finance industry should be a place where trust is paramount and accountability is not an afterthought. When things go awry as they have in Jackson’s case, seeking justice and financial redress becomes the path to setting things right.

Scroll to Top