SEC Charges Pennsylvania Advisor and Rubicon Wealth for M Fraud

SEC Charges Pennsylvania Advisor and Rubicon Wealth for $20M Fraud

Like other blue collar crimes, securities fraud is often committed by individuals who occupy positions of trust. So when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charges a former investment advisor like Scott J. Mason with misappropriation of funds, it’s a serious issue not just for the individuals and organizations defrauded, but for the entire investor community.

The Allegations against Scott J. Mason and His Companies

Mason, along with his companies, Rubicon Wealth Management LLC and Orchard Park Real Estate Holdings LLC, accused by the SEC of skimming more than $20 million from at least 13 Rubicon clients from 2014 to 2024. Allegedly, Mason not only made unauthorized transfers from client accounts to cover personal expenses but also went to the extent of forging signatures and providing bogus account statements and tax documents to cover his tracks.

As Mason reportedly held key roles in Rubicon, including president, managing member, and chief compliance officer, his actions have potential far-reaching consequences for all the 115 clients of Rubicon and their invested $231 million assets.

Background and Prior Complaints against the Financial Advisor

Mason is no novice in the financial services sector. Prior to these allegations, he held FINRA securities licenses, which lends weight to the accusation’s seriousness. However, this is not the first instance of complaints against Mason. In fact, data reveals a disturbing trend of recurrent infractions.

  • 2014: Mason faced his first claim for alleged misrepresentation and omission of important information in client interactions.
  • 2016: Another claim was filed, accusing Mason of excessively trading to generate higher commissions at the expense of the client’s profit.
  • 2017: Multiple claims alleged negligent supervision by Mason and unwarranted recommendations.

Understanding FINRA Rule in Simple Terms

OK, let’s bring some clarity into this situation. So what’s this FINRA rule all about? The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is essentially a regulatory body that sets the standards for fair and ethical practices in the financial services industry.

In simple terms, FINRA Rule 2111, also known as the Suitability Rule, stresses that all brokers must have a reasonable basis to believe that any transaction they recommend is suitable for the investor. This is based on the client’s investment profile, which includes factors such as age, investment experience, risk tolerance, financial situation, and investment objectives.

When violations of this rule occur, such as in Mason’s case, it’s a stark reminder to all investors to stay vigilant and be aware of where and how their money is being invested. As the renowned financier Warren Buffet wisely said, “Wall Street is the only place that people ride to in a Rolls Royce to get advice from those who take the subway.”

Consequences of Securities Fraud and Lessons Learned

Securities fraud is not a victimless crime; it’s a serious offense with severe penalties. For Scott J Mason, the judgment could result in permanent injunctions, fines, and a possible ban from the securities industry. The precise consequences, including financial penalties and disgorgement, are to be determined by the court.

Believe it or not, approximately 7 percent of advisors have been disciplined for a dispute, offense, or misconduct. The fallout from Mason’s case offers a word of caution to us all. Everyone, from industry veterans to novices, must prioritize due diligence in their investment decisions. Seek transparency from your financial advisors, and don’t shy away from asking tough questions. The world of finance might be complicated, but it’s not impenetrable.

Remember: the ultimate aim is to make your money work for you, and not the other way around!

Disclaimer: The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.
Scroll to Top