Financial Advisor P. Alison Fleming Faces 0K Complaint Over Waddell & Reed, LPL Investments

Financial Advisor P. Alison Fleming Faces $500K Complaint Over Waddell & Reed, LPL Investments

As a former financial advisor and legal expert with over a decade of experience, I’ve seen my fair share of investor complaints and the damaging effects they can have on both the accused advisor and their clients. The recent complaint against San Diego financial advisor P. Alison Fleming (CRD# 1960175) is a serious matter that warrants a closer look.

According to FINRA records, the complaint alleges that between 2019 and 2024, while Ms. Fleming was a representative of Waddell & Reed and LPL Financial, she recommended unsuitable mutual funds and exchange-traded funds to her client. The pending complaint alleges damages of a staggering $500,000.

As someone who has worked in both the financial and legal sectors, I understand the gravity of such allegations. Unsuitable investment recommendations can have devastating consequences for investors, leading to significant financial losses and eroded trust in their advisors.

The Advisor’s Background and Broker-Dealer

Ms. Fleming has an extensive background in the securities industry, with 35 years of experience under her belt. She is currently registered as a broker and investment advisor with LPL Financial, operating under the business name Lumena Financial Services. Prior to joining LPL Financial in 2021, she was registered with Waddell & Reed in San Diego from 1989 to 2021.

It’s worth noting that Ms. Fleming’s BrokerCheck report reveals no prior investor complaints. However, the seriousness of the current allegation cannot be understated, as it involves a substantial sum of money and spans a five-year period.

Understanding FINRA Rules and Suitability

FINRA, the regulatory body overseeing the securities industry, has strict rules in place to protect investors from unsuitable investment recommendations. FINRA Rule 2111 requires brokers to have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy is suitable for the customer, based on the customer’s investment profile.

This profile includes factors such as the investor’s age, financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, and investment experience. Advisors must take these factors into account when making recommendations to ensure that the investments align with the client’s best interests.

Consequences and Lessons Learned

The consequences of unsuitable investment recommendations can be severe for both the investor and the advisor. Investors may suffer significant financial losses, while advisors face potential disciplinary action, fines, and reputational damage.

As the famous investor Warren Buffett once said, “Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.” This quote underscores the importance of advisors thoroughly understanding their clients’ needs and the suitability of their recommendations.

It’s a sobering fact that according to a study by the North American Securities Administrators Association, bad financial advisors cost investors an estimated $40 billion annually. This highlights the need for investors to remain vigilant and for advisors to adhere to the highest ethical standards.

As the complaint against Ms. Fleming unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the trust placed in financial advisors and the dire consequences when that trust is breached. It is my hope that through increased education, transparency, and adherence to FINRA regulations, we can work towards a more secure and trustworthy financial advisory industry.

Scroll to Top