Ex-Morgan Stanley Broker Gallagher Under Investigation by FINRA

Ex-Morgan Stanley Broker Gallagher Under Investigation by FINRA

For years, I’ve been analyzing cases similar to Roger Albert Taft Gallagher’s—an ex-broker with Morgan Stanley who, due to alleged involvement in felonious activities, has been shown the revolving door by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

From my experience, these cases are always much more than just the headline. They imply a plethora of questions for the investors concerned. By examining the allegations against Gallagher, understanding his background, and dissecting the FINRA rules involved, we can bring some clarity to the situation.

Analysis: Allegations and Implications for Investors

Precisely what happened?

According to the available information, Gallagher was indicted for two felony counts related to mail fraud and fictitious obligations. There are strong allegations that Gallagher, in a fraudulent manner, used a $200,000 check for acquiring a Porsche SUV.

Before we proceed, I would like to add a quote from Warren Buffet: “In the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer than the windshield.” Certainly, with hindsight, there’s an understanding that clearer checks may have prevented this.

But now, what does this situation mean for current and potential investors?

First things first – following these allegations, Gallagher has been prohibited from the securities industry. This means he won’t be able to conduct any securities business, defend your investments, or provide advice on the same. If you’re an investor under his management, it’s high time to review your portfolio and possibly transition to a new broker.

A Sneak Peek into Gallagher’s Background

Gallagher has been part of the prominent Schwabacher Group at Morgan Stanley, where he worked from 2012 to 2024. Under his management, Gallagher had overseen assets worth a whopping $838 million. But unfortunately, this shiny facade hides some unpleasant realities.

Let’s see the dark side of the moon!

Gallagher’s Record

For those unaware, Gallagher(CRD#: 5513745) allegedly lost his position at Morgan Stanley in 2024 due to “third-party business dealings.” And in 2025, his affiliation with FINRA ended after he gave a cold shoulder to a criminal investigation.

Unraveling the FINRA Rule

FINRA is a self-regulatory body that works to ensure the integrity and fair dealing in the securities industry. One of the crucial aspects of maintaining the industry’s credibility is the careful monitoring of financial advisors/client relationships.

Under FINRA rules, it is obligatory for brokerage firms to supervise their advisors. This duty is essential to shield investors from potential malpractices. And that’s where Gallagher and Morgan Stanley come into the picture.

The Takeaways and Lessons Learned

Despite stringent rules, cases like Gallagher’s aren’t entirely avoidable. Here are some consequences and lessons for investors:

– There’s a high chance that damages incurred by affected investors due to Gallagher’s alleged misconduct could be bit recoverable through a FINRA arbitration claim.
– These incidents highlight the significance of brokers’ proper supervision by their employers. A discrepancy in this process may well leave the door ajar for fraudulent activities.
– Going by the saying “once burned, twice shy,” investors need to realize that a sound background check is imperative before signing with a financial advisor. An astounding fact is that 7.3% of advisors have reported misconduct.

In light of these points, investors must remain vigilant about their investment decisions. You must remind yourself that your hard-earned money deserves a trusted, experienced, and lawfully operating individual at its helm. Remember, awareness and prompt action are your best shields against potential investment losses.

Disclaimer: The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.
Scroll to Top