Ex-Broker Michael Lickiss Under Fire for Investor Disputes Totaling Over  Million

Ex-Broker Michael Lickiss Under Fire for Investor Disputes Totaling Over $4 Million

The Seriousness of the Allegations

As a financial analyst and legal expert, I want to shed light on Michael Lickiss‘s alleged misconduct as a financial broker. Lickiss has faced several investor disputes related to breach of fiduciary duty and fictitious bonds, with one particular claim even seeking damages as high as $561,257. The serious nature of these charges begs every investor’s attention.

Truly, the gravity of these allegations in the world of finance can’t be overstated. As investors, our relationships with our brokers rest on a foundation of trust. When allegations of a breach of fiduciary duty arise, that trust is shattered.

Know Your Broker

It is crucial to understand the background of your financial advisor. Michael Lickiss has an impressive career history, having worked for firms like Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments and Arkadios Capital. However, despite passing exams like the General Securities Principal Examination – Series 24, and General Securities Representative Examination – Series 7, Lickiss has faced multiple allegations involving fictitious bonds.

It would be an understatement to say that evaluating the reputation of your chosen broker is essential. Previous complaints and accusations can serve as vital warning signs, readying investors to make well-informed decisions.

Decoding the FINRA

FINRA Rule 2111 and Regulation Best Interest mandate that brokers should prioritize client’s best interests. NONetheless, brokers are not fiduciaries under these regulations. However, Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) are fiduciaries, and many brokers are dually registered as such, including Michael Lickiss.

FINRA Rule 2010 establishes high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. Moreover, under FINRA Rule 2150, the improper use of investors’ funds is explicitly prohibited.

Breaking down these rules, it basically means your broker has an obligation to treat you fairly, offering you the best possible financial advice.

Consequences and Lessons Learned

Benjamin Franklin once said, “An investment in knowledge pays the best interest.” This is a key takeaway from this case. The best defense against unscrupulous financial brokers is thorough research, informed decision making, and ongoing vigilance.

In this context, it’s worth noting that according to the North American Securities Administrators Association, half of all investment fraud victims reported not checking their broker’s or advisor’s background. This figure undoubtedly solidifies Franklin’s words.

Investment losses caused by a broker’s misconduct represent not only a financial casualty but a breach of trust. This experience can serve as a wake-up call to investors, emphasizing the need for due diligence and vigilance when entrusting our hard-earned money to supposed professionals.

I urge you to stay informed, verify the credibility of your broker, and remember, your intuition is sometimes your best guide when it comes to investing.

Remember, Michael Lickiss’s FINRA CRD number (5135936) – ensure you’re working with a trustworthy financial advisor and keep your investments secure.

Content curated with care and expertise by Emily Carter.

Correction or Updated Info Needed? The information in this article includes the publisher's opinion and is based on publicly available materials believed to be accurate at the time of publication.

We welcome updates. If you have personal knowledge of additional facts or details related to any issues or individuals, and you believe that information would enhance the accuracy of the article, don't hesitate to get in touch with us https://financialadvisorcomplaints.com/article-correction-update/ and provide you name, address, email, and telephone contact for follow-up reporting, along with the back-up for any updates. The publisher strives to provide the most up-to-date and most accurate report regarding all issues and events, and welcomes input from any individuals with personal knowledge.


DISCLAIMER: The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.

Scroll to Top