6

Broker James Pelletiere’s Troubling History: NYLife, Pruco Face Customer Fraud Concerns

As a financial analyst and legal expert with over a decade of experience, I’ve seen my fair share of concerning conduct in the financial industry. The case of James P. Pelletiere, a previously registered broker, is one that raises serious red flags for investors.

According to publicly available records released by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), James Pelletiere has been the subject of multiple customer disputes and regulatory actions. In April 2024, a customer alleged that Pelletiere forced her to purchase a policy with a premium higher than she was comfortable with, even going so far as to give her cash at her workplace to pay the first two months’ premium. When he later advised her that she could reduce the monthly payment, it caused the policy to default. The damage amount requested in this pending dispute is $10,050.00.

But this isn’t the only concerning incident in Pelletiere’s history. He has faced other allegations, including:

  • March 2024 – Complainants allege that signatures on documents related to fixed annuity and life insurance policies were not genuine, beginning around 2017. This dispute is still pending.
  • December 2022 – A customer alleged that Pelletiere did not fully disclose all facts regarding churning of policies and fees. The damage amount requested was $146,268.53, and the dispute settled for $148,532.53.

Most alarmingly, in October 2023, Pelletiere was barred by FINRA. Without admitting or denying the findings, he consented to the sanction and entry of findings that he refused to provide information and documents requested by FINRA in connection with their investigation into whether he had misused customer funds and accepted cash payments from a client.

Pelletiere’s background includes working with several prominent firms, including NYLife Securities, Inc., Park Avenue Securities, LLC, MML Investors Securities, LLC, and Pruco Securities, LLC. However, the multiple allegations and regulatory action paint a troubling picture.

FINRA Rule 2150 specifically addresses theft and conversion in a customer account, stating “no member or person associated with a member shall make improper use of a customer’s securities or funds.” This rule encompasses any “guarantee” that brokers make to customers regarding losses in a brokerage account.

Furthermore, excessive trading, or churning, as alleged in one of the customer disputes, occurs when a financial advisor puts their own interests ahead of the client’s, making transactions solely to generate commissions. This violates the advisor’s duty to recommend suitable investment strategies.

As the famous investor Warren Buffett once said, “Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.” Cases like this underscore the importance of thoroughly vetting your financial advisor and staying informed about their background and any regulatory actions or customer complaints.

A sobering statistic to consider: According to a 2020 report by the AARP, more than 60% of advisors who had harmed investors were still in business a year later. This highlights the crucial role of due diligence in protecting your investments and financial well-being.

The consequences for financial advisors who engage in misconduct can be severe, as evidenced by Pelletiere’s FINRA bar. However, the real lesson for investors is to remain vigilant, ask questions, and if something seems amiss, don’t hesitate to report it to the proper authorities. Your financial future is too important to leave in the hands of someone with a questionable track record.

Scroll to Top