Emily

Emily Carter is an experienced financial investigative journalist with over ten years in the field. A Stanford Economics graduate, she began her career as a financial analyst before transitioning to journalism. At FinancialAdvisorComplaints.com since 2020, Emily specializes in uncovering financial advisor malpractices and advocating for consumer rights. Her work, known for its thorough research and engaging narrative, has led to significant policy changes and industry reforms. Emily authors the weekly column "The Fiscal Watchdog," providing insights into financial trends and tips on selecting ethical advisors. Recognized for her contributions to financial journalism, she has received multiple awards and is a sought-after speaker at industry events. Outside of her investigative endeavors, Emily enjoys hiking and supporting financial literacy initiatives.

Emily
Fidelity Fires David Dodt for Allegedly Using Planning Tools Without Client Verification

Fidelity Fires David Dodt for Allegedly Using Planning Tools Without Client Verification

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

Fidelity Brokerage Services recently made headlines after terminating financial advisor David Dodt (CRD #5790376) on October 22, 2025. For clients and industry observers alike, the circumstances surrounding David Dodt’s dismissal bring up important questions about professional standards and client trust in the financial advisory world. According to his record, Fidelity Brokerage Services let Dodt go […]

Fidelity Fires David Dodt for Allegedly Using Planning Tools Without Client Verification Read More »

Financial Advisor Bernadette Baumgarten at NY Life Securities Faces 8K Exploitation Lawsuit

Financial Advisor Bernadette Baumgarten at NY Life Securities Faces $388K Exploitation Lawsuit

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

NY Life Securities LLC and Eagle Strategies LLC, two established names in the world of financial services, employ advisors across the United States to help clients reach their financial goals. Among their ranks is Bernadette Baumgarten, a registered financial advisor operating in both Florida and New York. Recently, Bernadette Baumgarten has become a focal point

Financial Advisor Bernadette Baumgarten at NY Life Securities Faces $388K Exploitation Lawsuit Read More »

Paul Meyer Suspended by FINRA for Unauthorized Trading at RBC Capital Markets

Paul Meyer Suspended by FINRA for Unauthorized Trading at RBC Capital Markets

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

RBC Capital Markets and financial advisor Paul Meyer recently drew attention from the industry and investors alike after a series of regulatory actions and client complaints shone a spotlight on the importance of trust—and verification—in wealth management. For clients across Minnetonka, Minnesota, and the many states where Paul Meyer is licensed, this situation is a

Paul Meyer Suspended by FINRA for Unauthorized Trading at RBC Capital Markets Read More »

Former B.C. Ziegler Broker William Bradish Faces Criminal Charges and Termination When trust meets trouble, investors pay the price. William Bradish (also known as Wesley Bradish), a former securities representative with CRD #4595880, now faces criminal charges that have sent ripples through his professional career. The case illuminates how quickly a broker’s world can unravel when legal troubles emerge. On July 9, 2025, criminal charges were filed against Bradish for allegedly giving false identification to law enforcement officers. The charge remains pending as of December 2025, creating uncertainty for both the broker and any clients who worked with him. Criminal investigations in the securities industry are serious business. They signal potential character issues that regulatory bodies take very seriously. The timeline tells a telling story. First came the criminal charge in July. Then, B.C. Ziegler and Company terminated Bradish’s employment on November 18, 2025, citing violations of company policy. The firm’s quick action suggests they viewed the situation as incompatible with their business standards. Companies don’t fire experienced brokers lightly, especially those with multiple securities licenses. Bradish wasn’t a newcomer to the industry. His credentials included passage of several important examinations. The Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) exam. The Series 7 for general securities representation. The Series 52 for municipal securities. The Series 63 for state law compliance. Even the specialized Series 79 for investment banking activities. These qualifications represent years of study and professional development. His employment history included positions at two notable firms. B.C. Ziegler and Company served as his most recent employer before the termination. Previously, he worked at RBC Capital Markets, LLC. Both firms carry substantial reputations in the financial services sector. Working for such established organizations typically indicates a broker has maintained clean compliance records. What makes this case particularly noteworthy is what’s missing from Bradish’s regulatory record. Zero customer complaints appear on his FINRA BrokerCheck profile. No arbitration cases filed by disgruntled investors. No civil lawsuits alleging securities violations or breach of fiduciary duty. His professional track record, from a customer service perspective, appears clean. The criminal investigation disclosure appeared on his BrokerCheck record as of December 8, 2025. This timing suggests the investigation may be broader than the single charge filed in July. Criminal investigations often take months or years to complete, depending on their complexity and scope. Professional Background and Regulatory History William Bradish built his career working for established financial institutions. B.C. Ziegler and Company (CRD #61) specializes in municipal finance and healthcare funding. RBC Capital Markets, LLC (CRD #31194) operates as a major investment banking platform. These firms don’t hire brokers casually. His examination record demonstrates broad securities knowledge. The Series 7 allows general securities sales. The Series 52 enables municipal bond transactions. The Series 63 covers state securities regulations. The Series 79 permits investment banking activities. This combination suggests Bradish worked across multiple product lines. Remarkably, his FINRA record shows no previous customer complaints. No arbitration proceedings. No civil litigation. No regulatory sanctions before the current situation. This clean history makes the criminal charges more surprising. Brokers with problematic patterns typically show warning signs in their regulatory records. The absence of customer complaints doesn’t guarantee proper conduct, but it suggests clients weren’t filing formal grievances. Many investment problems result in FINRA arbitration or civil lawsuits. Bradish’s record lacks these red flags that often predict future troubles. Understanding FINRA Rules and Legal Implications FINRA Rule 2010 forms the backbone of broker conduct standards. This rule requires all registered representatives to maintain high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. It’s deliberately broad language that covers virtually any unethical behavior. The rule doesn’t just apply to securities transactions. It encompasses all professional conduct that might reflect on a broker’s character or fitness. Criminal charges for false identification clearly fall under this umbrella. FINRA views character issues as directly relevant to investor protection. When brokers face criminal charges, they must report them promptly. Failure to disclose creates additional violations. The disclosure becomes part of their permanent BrokerCheck record, visible to current and potential clients. This transparency helps investors make informed decisions about their financial representatives. FINRA can impose sanctions even when criminal cases remain pending. They don’t need to wait for court convictions. Administrative actions might include fines, suspensions, or permanent bars from the industry. The severity depends on the charges’ nature and any aggravating factors. Criminal charges involving dishonesty pose particular problems for securities professionals. Trust forms the foundation of advisor-client relationships. When that trust comes into question, regulatory bodies typically respond decisively. Even minor criminal matters can end careers in this industry. Consequences and Critical Lessons The consequences for William Bradish extend far beyond potential criminal penalties. His termination from B.C. Ziegler likely ends his securities career indefinitely. Few firms hire brokers facing pending criminal charges, especially for offenses involving dishonesty. As Warren Buffett once observed, it takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. Bradish’s situation exemplifies this wisdom perfectly. Years of professional development and clean compliance records can evaporate when legal troubles emerge. Financial Fact: Studies indicate that approximately 7% of financial advisors have significant disciplinary histories, yet many investors never check BrokerCheck records before hiring advisors. For investors, this case highlights the importance of ongoing due diligence. BrokerCheck records change as new information emerges. What looks clean today might show problems tomorrow. Regular monitoring protects your interests. The lesson extends beyond individual cases. Regulatory systems work, but they’re not foolproof. FINRA rules provide frameworks for addressing misconduct, but prevention remains better than punishment. Investors must stay vigilant about their advisors’ conduct and regulatory status. Bradish’s case demonstrates how quickly circumstances can change in the securities industry. Criminal charges, employment termination, and career destruction occurred within months. The financial services sector doesn’t tolerate character questions, even when charges remain unresolved. This situation serves as a cautionary tale for both advisors and investors. Professional conduct matters enormously in finance. Trust, once broken, rarely returns. The regulatory system prioritizes investor protection over individual careers, as it should.

Former B.C. Ziegler Broker William Bradish Faces Criminal Charges and Termination When trust meets trouble, investors pay the price. William Bradish (also known as Wesley Bradish), a former securities representative with CRD #4595880, now faces criminal charges that have sent ripples through his professional career. The case illuminates how quickly a broker’s world can unravel when legal troubles emerge. On July 9, 2025, criminal charges were filed against Bradish for allegedly giving false identification to law enforcement officers. The charge remains pending as of December 2025, creating uncertainty for both the broker and any clients who worked with him. Criminal investigations in the securities industry are serious business. They signal potential character issues that regulatory bodies take very seriously. The timeline tells a telling story. First came the criminal charge in July. Then, B.C. Ziegler and Company terminated Bradish’s employment on November 18, 2025, citing violations of company policy. The firm’s quick action suggests they viewed the situation as incompatible with their business standards. Companies don’t fire experienced brokers lightly, especially those with multiple securities licenses. Bradish wasn’t a newcomer to the industry. His credentials included passage of several important examinations. The Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) exam. The Series 7 for general securities representation. The Series 52 for municipal securities. The Series 63 for state law compliance. Even the specialized Series 79 for investment banking activities. These qualifications represent years of study and professional development. His employment history included positions at two notable firms. B.C. Ziegler and Company served as his most recent employer before the termination. Previously, he worked at RBC Capital Markets, LLC. Both firms carry substantial reputations in the financial services sector. Working for such established organizations typically indicates a broker has maintained clean compliance records. What makes this case particularly noteworthy is what’s missing from Bradish’s regulatory record. Zero customer complaints appear on his FINRA BrokerCheck profile. No arbitration cases filed by disgruntled investors. No civil lawsuits alleging securities violations or breach of fiduciary duty. His professional track record, from a customer service perspective, appears clean. The criminal investigation disclosure appeared on his BrokerCheck record as of December 8, 2025. This timing suggests the investigation may be broader than the single charge filed in July. Criminal investigations often take months or years to complete, depending on their complexity and scope. Professional Background and Regulatory History William Bradish built his career working for established financial institutions. B.C. Ziegler and Company (CRD #61) specializes in municipal finance and healthcare funding. RBC Capital Markets, LLC (CRD #31194) operates as a major investment banking platform. These firms don’t hire brokers casually. His examination record demonstrates broad securities knowledge. The Series 7 allows general securities sales. The Series 52 enables municipal bond transactions. The Series 63 covers state securities regulations. The Series 79 permits investment banking activities. This combination suggests Bradish worked across multiple product lines. Remarkably, his FINRA record shows no previous customer complaints. No arbitration proceedings. No civil litigation. No regulatory sanctions before the current situation. This clean history makes the criminal charges more surprising. Brokers with problematic patterns typically show warning signs in their regulatory records. The absence of customer complaints doesn’t guarantee proper conduct, but it suggests clients weren’t filing formal grievances. Many investment problems result in FINRA arbitration or civil lawsuits. Bradish’s record lacks these red flags that often predict future troubles. Understanding FINRA Rules and Legal Implications FINRA Rule 2010 forms the backbone of broker conduct standards. This rule requires all registered representatives to maintain high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. It’s deliberately broad language that covers virtually any unethical behavior. The rule doesn’t just apply to securities transactions. It encompasses all professional conduct that might reflect on a broker’s character or fitness. Criminal charges for false identification clearly fall under this umbrella. FINRA views character issues as directly relevant to investor protection. When brokers face criminal charges, they must report them promptly. Failure to disclose creates additional violations. The disclosure becomes part of their permanent BrokerCheck record, visible to current and potential clients. This transparency helps investors make informed decisions about their financial representatives. FINRA can impose sanctions even when criminal cases remain pending. They don’t need to wait for court convictions. Administrative actions might include fines, suspensions, or permanent bars from the industry. The severity depends on the charges’ nature and any aggravating factors. Criminal charges involving dishonesty pose particular problems for securities professionals. Trust forms the foundation of advisor-client relationships. When that trust comes into question, regulatory bodies typically respond decisively. Even minor criminal matters can end careers in this industry. Consequences and Critical Lessons The consequences for William Bradish extend far beyond potential criminal penalties. His termination from B.C. Ziegler likely ends his securities career indefinitely. Few firms hire brokers facing pending criminal charges, especially for offenses involving dishonesty. As Warren Buffett once observed, it takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. Bradish’s situation exemplifies this wisdom perfectly. Years of professional development and clean compliance records can evaporate when legal troubles emerge. Financial Fact: Studies indicate that approximately 7% of financial advisors have significant disciplinary histories, yet many investors never check BrokerCheck records before hiring advisors. For investors, this case highlights the importance of ongoing due diligence. BrokerCheck records change as new information emerges. What looks clean today might show problems tomorrow. Regular monitoring protects your interests. The lesson extends beyond individual cases. Regulatory systems work, but they’re not foolproof. FINRA rules provide frameworks for addressing misconduct, but prevention remains better than punishment. Investors must stay vigilant about their advisors’ conduct and regulatory status. Bradish’s case demonstrates how quickly circumstances can change in the securities industry. Criminal charges, employment termination, and career destruction occurred within months. The financial services sector doesn’t tolerate character questions, even when charges remain unresolved. This situation serves as a cautionary tale for both advisors and investors. Professional conduct matters enormously in finance. Trust, once broken, rarely returns. The regulatory system prioritizes investor protection over individual careers, as it should.

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

B.C. Ziegler and Company, an established firm in municipal finance and healthcare funding, recently made headlines with the termination of one of its brokers, William Bradish (also known as Wesley Bradish). With a professional trajectory that included previous employment at RBC Capital Markets, LLC and a portfolio of challenging securities exams, Bradish’s sudden fall from

Former B.C. Ziegler Broker William Bradish Faces Criminal Charges and Termination When trust meets trouble, investors pay the price. William Bradish (also known as Wesley Bradish), a former securities representative with CRD #4595880, now faces criminal charges that have sent ripples through his professional career. The case illuminates how quickly a broker’s world can unravel when legal troubles emerge. On July 9, 2025, criminal charges were filed against Bradish for allegedly giving false identification to law enforcement officers. The charge remains pending as of December 2025, creating uncertainty for both the broker and any clients who worked with him. Criminal investigations in the securities industry are serious business. They signal potential character issues that regulatory bodies take very seriously. The timeline tells a telling story. First came the criminal charge in July. Then, B.C. Ziegler and Company terminated Bradish’s employment on November 18, 2025, citing violations of company policy. The firm’s quick action suggests they viewed the situation as incompatible with their business standards. Companies don’t fire experienced brokers lightly, especially those with multiple securities licenses. Bradish wasn’t a newcomer to the industry. His credentials included passage of several important examinations. The Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) exam. The Series 7 for general securities representation. The Series 52 for municipal securities. The Series 63 for state law compliance. Even the specialized Series 79 for investment banking activities. These qualifications represent years of study and professional development. His employment history included positions at two notable firms. B.C. Ziegler and Company served as his most recent employer before the termination. Previously, he worked at RBC Capital Markets, LLC. Both firms carry substantial reputations in the financial services sector. Working for such established organizations typically indicates a broker has maintained clean compliance records. What makes this case particularly noteworthy is what’s missing from Bradish’s regulatory record. Zero customer complaints appear on his FINRA BrokerCheck profile. No arbitration cases filed by disgruntled investors. No civil lawsuits alleging securities violations or breach of fiduciary duty. His professional track record, from a customer service perspective, appears clean. The criminal investigation disclosure appeared on his BrokerCheck record as of December 8, 2025. This timing suggests the investigation may be broader than the single charge filed in July. Criminal investigations often take months or years to complete, depending on their complexity and scope. Professional Background and Regulatory History William Bradish built his career working for established financial institutions. B.C. Ziegler and Company (CRD #61) specializes in municipal finance and healthcare funding. RBC Capital Markets, LLC (CRD #31194) operates as a major investment banking platform. These firms don’t hire brokers casually. His examination record demonstrates broad securities knowledge. The Series 7 allows general securities sales. The Series 52 enables municipal bond transactions. The Series 63 covers state securities regulations. The Series 79 permits investment banking activities. This combination suggests Bradish worked across multiple product lines. Remarkably, his FINRA record shows no previous customer complaints. No arbitration proceedings. No civil litigation. No regulatory sanctions before the current situation. This clean history makes the criminal charges more surprising. Brokers with problematic patterns typically show warning signs in their regulatory records. The absence of customer complaints doesn’t guarantee proper conduct, but it suggests clients weren’t filing formal grievances. Many investment problems result in FINRA arbitration or civil lawsuits. Bradish’s record lacks these red flags that often predict future troubles. Understanding FINRA Rules and Legal Implications FINRA Rule 2010 forms the backbone of broker conduct standards. This rule requires all registered representatives to maintain high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. It’s deliberately broad language that covers virtually any unethical behavior. The rule doesn’t just apply to securities transactions. It encompasses all professional conduct that might reflect on a broker’s character or fitness. Criminal charges for false identification clearly fall under this umbrella. FINRA views character issues as directly relevant to investor protection. When brokers face criminal charges, they must report them promptly. Failure to disclose creates additional violations. The disclosure becomes part of their permanent BrokerCheck record, visible to current and potential clients. This transparency helps investors make informed decisions about their financial representatives. FINRA can impose sanctions even when criminal cases remain pending. They don’t need to wait for court convictions. Administrative actions might include fines, suspensions, or permanent bars from the industry. The severity depends on the charges’ nature and any aggravating factors. Criminal charges involving dishonesty pose particular problems for securities professionals. Trust forms the foundation of advisor-client relationships. When that trust comes into question, regulatory bodies typically respond decisively. Even minor criminal matters can end careers in this industry. Consequences and Critical Lessons The consequences for William Bradish extend far beyond potential criminal penalties. His termination from B.C. Ziegler likely ends his securities career indefinitely. Few firms hire brokers facing pending criminal charges, especially for offenses involving dishonesty. As Warren Buffett once observed, it takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. Bradish’s situation exemplifies this wisdom perfectly. Years of professional development and clean compliance records can evaporate when legal troubles emerge. Financial Fact: Studies indicate that approximately 7% of financial advisors have significant disciplinary histories, yet many investors never check BrokerCheck records before hiring advisors. For investors, this case highlights the importance of ongoing due diligence. BrokerCheck records change as new information emerges. What looks clean today might show problems tomorrow. Regular monitoring protects your interests. The lesson extends beyond individual cases. Regulatory systems work, but they’re not foolproof. FINRA rules provide frameworks for addressing misconduct, but prevention remains better than punishment. Investors must stay vigilant about their advisors’ conduct and regulatory status. Bradish’s case demonstrates how quickly circumstances can change in the securities industry. Criminal charges, employment termination, and career destruction occurred within months. The financial services sector doesn’t tolerate character questions, even when charges remain unresolved. This situation serves as a cautionary tale for both advisors and investors. Professional conduct matters enormously in finance. Trust, once broken, rarely returns. The regulatory system prioritizes investor protection over individual careers, as it should. Read More »

Advisor Kyle Critcher Sanctioned for Misrepresenting Corporate Bonds as FDIC-Insured CDs at LPL Financial

Advisor Kyle Critcher Sanctioned for Misrepresenting Corporate Bonds as FDIC-Insured CDs at LPL Financial

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

LPL Financial, one of the nation’s largest independent broker-dealers, has come under scrutiny following a compliance violation by a former representative, Kyle Critcher. Based in Fort Mill, South Carolina, Kyle Critcher (CRD# 7351555) was terminated from LPL Financial in July 2024 after failing to follow clear client instructions regarding the purchase of a certificate of

Advisor Kyle Critcher Sanctioned for Misrepresenting Corporate Bonds as FDIC-Insured CDs at LPL Financial Read More »

David Franklin Barred by FINRA After Federal Criminal Charges for Healthcare Fraud

David Franklin Barred by FINRA After Federal Criminal Charges for Healthcare Fraud

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

Integral Wealth Securities LLC once employed David Kitchen Franklin, a financial advisor whose career in the securities industry took a dramatic turn in 2025. Previously registered with 1st Bridgehouse Securities LLC and Toll Cross Securities USA Inc., Franklin had a professional background distinguished by passing several rigorous FINRA examinations and maintaining a clean regulatory record—until

David Franklin Barred by FINRA After Federal Criminal Charges for Healthcare Fraud Read More »

Doug McCauley Barred by FINRA After Refusing to Cooperate with Madison Avenue Securities Probe

Doug McCauley Barred by FINRA After Refusing to Cooperate with Madison Avenue Securities Probe

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

Madison Avenue Securities faced heightened scrutiny in December 2024 when veteran Arlington, Virginia-based advisor Doug McCauley was barred by FINRA. After nearly three decades in the securities industry, McCauley’s career ended not due to allegations of fraud, misappropriation, or direct client harm—but because he declined to cooperate with a regulator’s investigation into his outside business

Doug McCauley Barred by FINRA After Refusing to Cooperate with Madison Avenue Securities Probe Read More »

I notice that you haven’t provided the specific information I need to create the news title you’re requesting. To write an engaging headline under 15 words that includes the financial advisor’s name and broker-dealer name, I would need: Missing Information: – The specific financial advisor’s name – The broker-dealer firm’s name – Details about the allegations or case Current Information Available: – Gray Digital fraud case involving Nathan Gauvin – Crypto investment fraud allegations – But unclear if this is the advisor you want featured Suggested Next Steps: Could you please clarify: 1. Is Nathan Gauvin the financial advisor for the title? 2. What is his broker-dealer affiliation? 3. Are there other parties involved I should know about? Once you provide the financial advisor’s name and their associated broker-dealer firm, I can create an engaging, factual headline that meets your 15-word limit without inflammatory language. Example format (once I have the details): “[Advisor Name] of [Broker-Dealer] Faces [Type of Allegations] in [Brief Case Description]” Please share the specific advisor and firm names so I can craft the appropriate headline for your needs.

I notice that you haven’t provided the specific information I need to create the news title you’re requesting. To write an engaging headline under 15 words that includes the financial advisor’s name and broker-dealer name, I would need: Missing Information: – The specific financial advisor’s name – The broker-dealer firm’s name – Details about the allegations or case Current Information Available: – Gray Digital fraud case involving Nathan Gauvin – Crypto investment fraud allegations – But unclear if this is the advisor you want featured Suggested Next Steps: Could you please clarify: 1. Is Nathan Gauvin the financial advisor for the title? 2. What is his broker-dealer affiliation? 3. Are there other parties involved I should know about? Once you provide the financial advisor’s name and their associated broker-dealer firm, I can create an engaging, factual headline that meets your 15-word limit without inflammatory language. Example format (once I have the details): “[Advisor Name] of [Broker-Dealer] Faces [Type of Allegations] in [Brief Case Description]” Please share the specific advisor and firm names so I can craft the appropriate headline for your needs.

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

Gray Digital and financial advisor Nathan Gauvin have recently been the focus of considerable attention due to allegations of investment fraud involving cryptocurrency products. The case resonates within the broader financial advisory industry, where investor trust hinges on ethical conduct and transparent business practices. Understanding the circumstances surrounding the allegations, as well as the applicable

I notice that you haven’t provided the specific information I need to create the news title you’re requesting. To write an engaging headline under 15 words that includes the financial advisor’s name and broker-dealer name, I would need: Missing Information: – The specific financial advisor’s name – The broker-dealer firm’s name – Details about the allegations or case Current Information Available: – Gray Digital fraud case involving Nathan Gauvin – Crypto investment fraud allegations – But unclear if this is the advisor you want featured Suggested Next Steps: Could you please clarify: 1. Is Nathan Gauvin the financial advisor for the title? 2. What is his broker-dealer affiliation? 3. Are there other parties involved I should know about? Once you provide the financial advisor’s name and their associated broker-dealer firm, I can create an engaging, factual headline that meets your 15-word limit without inflammatory language. Example format (once I have the details): “[Advisor Name] of [Broker-Dealer] Faces [Type of Allegations] in [Brief Case Description]” Please share the specific advisor and firm names so I can craft the appropriate headline for your needs. Read More »

Josh Jaffe Faces 2,330 Suitability Complaint at Ameriprise Over Credit Line Losses

Josh Jaffe Faces $202,330 Suitability Complaint at Ameriprise Over Credit Line Losses

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

Steward Partners and advisor Josh Jaffe are well-known names in the financial services sector, particularly in Newark, Ohio where Mr. Jaffe is registered as part of the firm’s Longbridge Wealth group. With over 19 years of experience across several major financial institutions, including previous roles at Ameriprise Financial Services, JP Morgan Securities, Chase Investment Services,

Josh Jaffe Faces $202,330 Suitability Complaint at Ameriprise Over Credit Line Losses Read More »

John Pulliam Fired by Raymond James Over Undisclosed Outside Business Activities

John Pulliam Fired by Raymond James Over Undisclosed Outside Business Activities

Financial Advisor Complaints / By

Raymond James Financial Services made headlines in September 2025 with the termination of longtime advisor John Pulliam, a veteran broker carrying 32 years of experience in the securities industry. While the publicly stated reason was conduct “inconsistent with firm policies on outside business activities,” the implications — for clients, regulators, and the advisor himself —

John Pulliam Fired by Raymond James Over Undisclosed Outside Business Activities Read More »

Scroll to Top