Emerson Equity, operating under the name Tangible Wealth Solutions, finds itself under scrutiny as a recent investor complaint targets one of its own: Ryan Finch. As a financial advisor based in Greenwood, Colorado, Ryan Finch has served in the securities industry for more than a decade and is currently registered both as a broker and investment advisor with Emerson Equity. Yet in July 2025, a pending complaint landed on his record, alleging severe financial misconduct and seeking a substantial $542,000 in damages. This claim not only raises questions about Ryan Finch’s advisory practices, but also serves as a cautionary tale for investors everywhere.
Behind the Allegations: The Complaint Against Ryan Finch
When an investor complaint alleges damages exceeding half a million dollars, it commands attention across the financial community. According to filings, the July 2025 action accuses Ryan Finch and Emerson Equity (dba Tangible Wealth Solutions) of several serious breaches:
- Violation of state and federal securities laws
- Breach of fiduciary duty
- Common law fraud
- Negligence
- Breach of contract with the investor
Each allegation cited in the complaint—especially in the context of a single client—reflects issues that can give rise to significant financial harm. These types of accusations are not uncommon in the world of investment fraud, which according to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), costs investors billions of dollars collectively each year. The risk of poor or unethical advice from financial professionals underscores the importance of understanding who manages your money and what their legal responsibilities truly are (Investopedia: What is Investment Fraud?).
About Ryan Finch: Registration, Exams, and Industry Background
Ryan Finch (CRD# 6379871) presents a professional profile that, on paper, resembles many well-qualified advisors in the industry. As of October 25, 2025, he is licensed in 23 different states, having passed five demanding regulatory examinations that permit him to facilitate both brokerage services and investment advisory work. His credentials include:
| Exam | Description |
|---|---|
| Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) | Introduces basic concepts of the securities industry |
| Series 7 (General Securities Representative Exam) | Enables the sale of a wide range of securities |
| Series 22 (Direct Participation Programs Rep Exam) | Covers direct participation programs (e.g., real estate, oil and gas) |
| Series 63 (Uniform Securities Agent State Law Exam) | Focuses on state securities law and regulation |
| Series 65 (Uniform Investment Adviser Law Exam) | Qualifies candidates as investment adviser representatives |
Before joining Emerson Equity in 2020, Ryan Finch developed his experience at Colorado Financial Services Corporation (2017–2020) and Cobiz Wealth (2014–2017). These ten years in the industry, along with the absence of prior complaint disclosures or disciplinary actions before July 2025, signaled a career on stable ground—until this recent high-stakes complaint.
Understanding the Nature of the Allegations
The pending complaint against Mr. Finch contains allegations that strike at the heart of investor trust. Here is a breakdown of the commonly cited issues in such cases:
- Breach of fiduciary duty: Financial advisors who act as fiduciaries must put their clients’ interests above their own. A breach could involve recommending investments that benefit the advisor at the client’s expense. This duty is a pivotal element in client-advisor relationships and a core tenant of ethical investment practice.
- Common law fraud: This involves knowingly misleading the client, misrepresenting risk, or concealing important information. Fraud is generally more difficult to prove than negligence but carries severe consequences and regulatory action if established.
- Negligence: Even without ill intent, an advisor can be negligent by failing to monitor a client’s account properly, not conducting appropriate due diligence, or overlooking diversification principles.
- Breach of contract: Investment contracts set clear expectations between advisor and client. Violating any of the terms can open the door to litigation, regulatory review, and loss of client assets.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suitability rule—FINRA Rule 2111—requires all brokers to ensure that any recommendation matches the client’s needs, objectives, and risk tolerance. Even if a broker is not a fiduciary, they must only sell investments appropriate for the customer’s individual profile.
The Prevalence and Cost of Poor Financial Advice
Investment fraud and advisor misconduct are widespread issues. Research by the University of Chicago and University of Minnesota reveals that about 7% of financial advisors have a misconduct record. Worryingly, many of those with misconduct histories go on to find work at new firms—and are statistically more likely to reoffend. This underscores why tools like BrokerCheck and other resources, such as FinancialAdvisorComplaints.com, are invaluable for investors conducting due diligence.
Here are some cautionary statistics to keep in mind:
- FINRA reported nearly 5,100 arbitration cases involving securities in 2023 alone (Bloomberg Markets).
- It is estimated that U.S. investors lose billions to advisor misconduct, fraud, and bad advice annually.
- Financial advisor malpractice can cause irreparable damage to retirement plans and long-term wealth goals.
What Should Investors Do Next?
If you work with a financial advisor—or are considering hiring one—it pays to be vigilant. Here are some actionable tips for investors to help avoid becoming a victim of poor advice or outright fraud:
- Check BrokerCheck regularly: Review your advisor’s record for complaints, disclosures, and regulatory actions. It’s updated frequently and free to access.
- Understand fiduciary duty: Not every advisor acts as a fiduciary on every account. Ask pointed questions about how your interests are safeguarded.
- Diversify and question recommendations: Be skeptical of high-pressure sales tactics or offers that seem too good to be true.
- Keep thorough documentation: Save all relevant correspondence, statements, and transaction records in case concerns arise in the future.
Summary: Ryan Finch’s Pending Complaint and Broader Lessons
Ryan Finch (CRD# 6379871), with ten years of experience and a formerly clean record, now faces a pending $542,000 complaint that has brought renewed focus to the importance of transparency and diligence in the advisory field. While no findings have yet been made—the complaint is still pending—its mere existence is an important reminder of the risks inherent in financial relationships. Arbitration or settlement could decide the outcome, with confidentiality sometimes obscuring the full picture for the public.
As Warren Buffett famously observed: “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it.” In the world of investment advice, that couldn’t be truer. Whether you are a seasoned investor or just beginning, take proactive steps to confirm that your advisor’s actions and recommendations align squarely with your long-term interests—and always remember that trust is earned, but ongoing verification is essential.
Correction or Updated Info Needed? The information in this article includes the publisher's opinion and is based on publicly available materials believed to be accurate at the time of publication.
We welcome updates. If you have personal knowledge of additional facts or details related to any issues or individuals, and you believe that information would enhance the accuracy of the article, don't hesitate to get in touch with us https://financialadvisorcomplaints.com/article-correction-update/ and provide you name, address, email, and telephone contact for follow-up reporting, along with the back-up for any updates. The publisher strives to provide the most up-to-date and most accurate report regarding all issues and events, and welcomes input from any individuals with personal knowledge.
DISCLAIMER: The information herein is derived from public sources and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Legal matters may have subsequent developments, and market values may fluctuate. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations about the completeness or reliability of this information. Readers should independently verify all content and seek professional advice as needed.




